Mr. S.c. Puspalak, Advocate v. Opposite Parties

Order No.01. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 21409 of 2021 Petitioner Gopal Krushna Naik ..... Mr. S.C. Puspalak, Advocate -Versus- ….. Opposite Parties The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Odisha & Others Mr. R. Chimnka, Advocate CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI ORDER05.08.2021 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties to opposite parties to consider the grievance of the petitioner for appointment under the rehabilitation assistance scheme within a stipulate time. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-8 and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time. Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-8 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of authenticated/certified copy of this order. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.