In Mr. Sham v. Abhay Ahuja, Jj, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 3Time to remove office objections is extended by two weeks fromtoday, failing which, the appeal will stand dismissed without furtherreference to this court.today, failing which, the appeal will stand dismissed without furtherreference to this court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINTERIM APPLICATION NO.854 OF 2021
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1327 OF 2019
PR.Commissioner of Income Tax-24,Mumbai
….Appellant/Applicant
V/s.
Amit Babulal Harsora
…Respondent
----
Mr. Sham V. Walve for applicant/appellant. None for respondent.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATED : 4[th] AUGUST 2021
ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
P.C. :
1Heard Mr. Walve and also considered the application. The reasons areexplained in the affidavit and we are satisfied with the explanation. Thedelay is condoned.explained in the affidavit and we are satisfied with the explanation. Thedelay is condoned.
2Application accordingly stands disposed.
3Time to remove office objections is extended by two weeks fromtoday, failing which, the appeal will stand dismissed without furtherreference to this court.today, failing which, the appeal will stand dismissed without furtherreference to this court.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue