Mr. Sham v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj
High Court
25 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mr. Sham v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj
Date of order
25 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. Sham v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byPURTIPURTIPRASADPRASADPARABPARABDate:2021.11.2715:03:09+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3402 OF 2019
Shantidevi Saraf V/s.
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 25 (1), Mumbai & Ors.
….Petitioner
…Respondents
---- ----
Mr. Madhur Agrawal i/b Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Petitioner.
Mr. Sham V. Walve a/w Mr. Pritish Chatterjee for Respondents-Revenue.
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATED : 25[th] NOVEMBER 2021
P.C. :
1.Mentioned. Not on Board. By consent taken up.
2.Counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with
liberty to take all rights and contentions including insufficient reasoning and
challenge to validity of the notice before the concerned authority.
3.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.