Mr. Sham v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj
High Court
25 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mr. Sham v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj
Date of order
25 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. Sham v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 3.All Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
PURTIPRASADPARABDigitally signed byPURTI PRASADPARABDate: 2021.11.2517:48:47 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 413 OF 2018ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3134 OF 2018ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3142 OF 2018ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2585 OF 2019
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1
V/s.
….Appellant
M/s. Fresenius Kabi India Pvt. Ltd.
….Respondent
-----
Mr. Sham V. Walve a/w Mr. Pritish Chatterjee for Appellant.Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Respondent.
-----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATED : 25[th] NOVEMBER 2021
P.C. :
1.Mr. Walve states that the assessee has settled under the Direct
Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (DTVSV Act) and Form No.5 has beenissued by the department.
2.Mr. Walve therefore seeks leave to withdraw these appeals.
3.All Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
4.
Refund of court fee, if any, be paid in accordance with rules.
( AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue