Case Law › High Court › Mr. Sham v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj Dated : 6...

Mr. Sham v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj Dated : 6Th December 2021

High Court 06 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

06 Dec 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. Sham v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj Dated : 6Th December 2021, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Digitallysigned byMEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVJADHAVDate:2021.12.0617:26:28+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax-24 Mumbai V/s. ….Appellant Kalparishi Construction Co. …Respondent ---- Mr. Sham V. Walve for AppellantMr. K. Gopal i/b Mr. Satendra Pandey for Respondent ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ DATED : 6th DECEMBER 2021 P.C. : 1Mr. Walve seeks leave to withdraw the appeal since the tax effect is below Rs.1 crores though, in the appeal memo it was mentioned as about Rs.1.87 crores. 2Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. 3Refund of court fees, if any, in accordance with rules. (AMIT B. BORKAR, J) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.