Mr. Sham v. Dated : 17[Th] June, 2016
High Court
17 Jun 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mr. Sham v. Dated : 17[Th] June, 2016
Date of order
17 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. Sham v. Dated : 17[Th] June, 2016, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 3.In case, the necessary objections are not removed and the CD's are not filed within a period of three weeks from today, the appeals shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 551 OF 2015ALONG WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NOS. 718/15, 820/15, 844/15,
854/15, 966/15, 972/15, 1001/15, 1004/15, 1010/15, 1011/15,
1012/15, 1044/15, 1049/15, 1069/15, 1126/15, 1149/15,
1178/15, 1184/15, 1206/15, 1242/15, 1244/15, 1247/15,
1248/15, 1385/15, 1394/15, 1397/15, 1427/15, 1428/15,
1433/15, 1437/15, 1439/15, 1442/15, 1449/15, 1451/15,
1453/15, 1455/15, 1465/15, 1466/15, 1490/15, 1497/15,
1499/15, 1508/15, 1511/15, 1514/15, 1536/15, 1553/15,
1555/15, 1566/15, 1567/15, 1568/15, 1569/15, 1571/15,
1603/15, 1627/15, 1636/15, 1648/15, 1655/15, 1743/15,
1759/15, 1761/15, 1770/15, 1777/15, 1779/15, 1786/15,
1807/15, 1809/15, 1810/15, 1838/15, 1841/15, 1842/15,
1844/15, 1855/15, 1856/15, 1891/15, 1918/15, 1919/15,
1920/15, 1921/15, 1922/15, 1923/15, 1931/15, 1938/15,
1939/15, 1948/15, 1953/15, 1954/15, 1973/15, 1974/15, 1975/15, 1976/15, 1978/15, 1988/15, 1992/15, 1995/15, 2013/15, 2020/15, 3/2016, 15/2016, 16/16, 17/16, 18/16, 53/16, 54/16, 55/16, 78/16, 79/16, 81/16, 87/16, 101/16, 143/16, 253/16, 270/16, 294/16, 295/16, 310/16, 312/16, 334/16, 343/16, 352/16, 362/16, 368/16, 372/16, 401/16, 466/16,
***************************
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant in Appeal (L) Nos. 551/15, 966/15, 972/15, 1001/15, 1004/15, 1010/15, 1011/15, 1012/15, 1049/15, 1178/15, 1184/15, 1242/15, 1244/15, 1247/15, 1248/15, 1397/15, 1427/15, 1428/15, 1433/15, 1437/15, 1439/15, 1442/15, 1449/15, 1451/15, 1453/15, 1455/15, 1465/15, 1466/15, 1490/15, 1497/15, 1499/15, 1514/15, 1553/15, 1555/15, 1566/15, 1567/15, 1568/15, 1569/15, 1636/15, 1759/15, 1770/15, 1777/15, 1779/15, 1786/15,
1807/15, 1809/15, 1810/15, 1841/15, 1842/15, 1844/15, 1855/15,
1856/15, 1891/15, 1918/15, 1919/15, 1920/15, 1921/15, 1922/15,
1923/15, 1931/15, 1953/15, 1954/15, 1973/15, 1974/15, 1975/15, 1976/15, 2013/15, 2020/15, 3/16, 15/16, 16/16, 17/16, 18/16, 53/16, 54/16, 55/16, 87/16, 101/16, 334/16,
Mrs. S.V. Bharucha for the appellant in Appeal (L) No.1385/15
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the appellant in Appeal (L) Nos. 1571/15, 1627/15, 1938/15, 1939/15, 1948/15, 372/16,
Mr. Sham V. Walve for the appellant in Appeal (L) No. 1655/15
Mr. N.C. Mohanty for the appellant in Appeal (L) No.1838/15, 78/16, 79/16, 81/16,
Ms. Sahani i/b Navdeep Vora Associates for the respondent in Appeal (L) No. 551/15,
Mr. Atul Jasani for the respondent in Appeal(L) Nos. 718/15, 1394/15, 78/16, 79/16 and for the appellant in Appeal (L) No.143/16, 352/16,
Mr. Mihir C. Naniwadekar for the respondent in Appeal (L) No. 1049/15,
Ms. Vasanti B. Patel for the respondent in Appeal (L) No. 1178/15,
Mr. Sameer Dalal for the respondent in Appeal (L) No. 1437/15, 1920/15
Mr. P.C. Tripathi for the respondent in Appeal (L) No. 1466/15, 1844/15
Mr. Rajesh Poojari for the respondent in Appeal (L) No. 1553/15
Mr. Balasaheb G. Yewale Dalal for the respondent in Appeal (L) No. 1743/15
Ms. Rutuja Pawar for the respondent in Appeal (L) No.1921/15
Mr. Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent in Appeal (L) No.1953/15
Ms. Usha I. Dalal for the respondent in Appeal (L) No.343/16
Mr. Sparsh Prasad for the respondent in Appeal (L) No.372/16
Mr. Neelabh Shreesh for the appellant in Appeal (L) No.466/16,
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & M.S. SONAK, J.J.
DATED : 17[th] JUNE, 2016.
P.C.
1.All the above appeals continued to be on lodging number. The appellants have not removed office objections and / or not furnished the necessary CD's of the pleadings.
2.The appellants are directed to remove the objections and file the necessary CD's, relevant to their appeals within a period of three weeks from today.
Mr. Balasaheb G. Yewale Dalal for the respondent in Appeal (L) No. 1743/15
Ms. Rutuja Pawar for the respondent in Appeal (L) No.1921/15
Mr. Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent in Appeal (L) No.1953/15
Ms. Usha I. Dalal for the respondent in Appeal (L) No.343/16
Mr. Sparsh Prasad for the respondent in Appeal (L) No.372/16
Mr. Neelabh Shreesh for the appellant in Appeal (L) No.466/16,
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & M.S. SONAK, J.J.
DATED : 17[th] JUNE, 2016.
P.C.
1.All the above appeals continued to be on lodging number. The appellants have not removed office objections and / or not furnished the necessary CD's of the pleadings.
2.The appellants are directed to remove the objections and file the necessary CD's, relevant to their appeals within a period of three weeks from today.
3.In case, the necessary objections are not removed and the CD's are not filed within a period of three weeks from today, the appeals shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(M.S. SONAK, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.