Mr. Sham v. Heard Learned Counsel For The Parties

DDR IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 818 OF 2019ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1645 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 23 Mumbai … Applicant In the matter betweenPr. Commissioner of Income Tax 23 MumbaiVs.Parvez Mohammad Hussain Ghaswala … Appellant … Respondent …........ Mr. Sham V. Walve for the Applicant.Mr. Sameer Dalal i/b. Aasifa Khan for respondent. …........ CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 18 DECEMBER 2019 P.C.:- Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2.At the outset learned counsel for the Appellant tendersapology for not remaining present on the last date and points outthat the Panel Advocate was entrusted with the Appeal no longercontinues on the Panel of the Income Tax Department. In view ofthis position, Notice of Motion for restoration is allowed. TheAppeal stands restored to file. To be listed as per its turn. (M.S.KARNIK, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)