Mr. Sham v. Itxa 462-05 & Ors.doc
High Court
08 Jan 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mr. Sham v. Itxa 462-05 & Ors.doc
Date of order
08 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. Sham v. Itxa 462-05 & Ors.doc, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.In the above view, all the appeals are disposed of interms of the above Circular.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
53. itxa 462-05 & ors.doc
Pradnya Bhogale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 462 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income-Tax-XVI, City-Mum. ..Appellantvs.M/s. Shreeji Exports ..Respondent
..Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS.505/200537/200648/200691/2006149/2006398/2006667/20071008/20071339/20071520/2007648/201217/2008
........
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant in ITXA Nos.462/2005,
37/2006, 398/2006, 1008/2007, 1520/2007, 648/2012 and17/2008.
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Appellant in ITXA Nos.505/2005,48/2006 and 667/2007.
Mr. Sham V. Walve for the Appellant in ITXA Nos.91/2006 and149/2006.
Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for the Appellant in ITXA
No.1339/2007.
Ms. Namrata Kasale for the Respondent in ITXA No.462/2005.
Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent in ITXA Nos.149/2006,667/2007 and 17/2008.
Ms. Aarati Sathe for the Respondent in ITXA Nos.1520/2007 and648/2012.
........
CORAM :M.S. SANKLECHA ANDNITIN JAMDAR, JJ.
DATE :8 JANUARY 2020.
P.C. :
On the last date, we had adjourned these appeals at theinstance of the learned counsel for the Revenue to enable them totake instructions to withdraw these appeals in terms of CircularNo. 17 of 2019 dated 8 August 2019 issued by the Central Boardfor Direct Taxes (CBDT).
2.Today, the learned Counsel appearing in support ofthe appeals state that in spite of their best efforts, no instructionsare forthcoming from the Revenue. All of them state that the taxeffect involved in all these appeals is less than the threshold limitof Rs. 1.00 crore as provided in the CBDT Circular dated8 August 2019.
3.In the above view, all the appeals are disposed of interms of the above Circular. Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
4.However, it is made clear that in case the Officers ofthe Revenue inform the learned counsel for the Revenue that anyof these appeals are not covered by the above CBDT Circulardated 8 August 2019, then the parties are at liberty to move thisCourt for recall of this order in respect of those appeals.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.)
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.