Mr. Sham v. Itxast 1285-18.Doc

DDR IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL ST. NO.1285 OF 2018 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 ..Appellant vs.Capgemini Technologies Services India Ltd.(formerly known as IGATE Global SolutionsLtd.) ..Respondent …........ Mr. Sham V. Walve for appellant.Mr. Atul Jasani for respondent. …........ CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 6 JANUARY 2020 P.C.:- Learned counsel for the Appellant states that when theAppeal was filed the position was unclear whether the Appealshould be filed in this Court or in the High Court of Telangana.Learned counsel submits that the issue has been examined and hehas received instructions to withdraw the Appeal to file the samein the High Court of Telangana. He states that this Court, in thecase of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Pune vs. M/s. SungardSolutions (I) Pvt. Ltd. (Income Tax Appeal No. 1142 of 2016) inidentical circumstances has returned the papers of the appeal tothe Appellant – Revenue to file the same in the appropriate Court. 2.The papers of the Appeal be returned to the Appellant– Revenue to file the same in the appropriate Court. The Appealis disposed of in above terms. (M.S.KARNIK, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) Digitallysigned byDikshaDiksha RaneDate:Rane2020.01.0818:19:53+0530