Case LawHigh Court › Mr. Sham v. N. R. Borkar, Jj

Mr. Sham v. N. R. Borkar, Jj

High Court 30 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mr. Sham v. N. R. Borkar, Jj
Date of order
30 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. Sham v. N. R. Borkar, Jj, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 393 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 454 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 415 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 431 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1208 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 378 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 374 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1080 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 834 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1119 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1084 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 880 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 739 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 932 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 282 OF 2021ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 981 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 904 OF 2020ALONGWITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 99 OF 2021ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 903 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 931 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 578 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1306 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 435 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1045 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1370 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1352 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1350 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1409 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1064 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1218 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 421 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 632 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1191 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 805 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 189 OF 2021ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 844 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1025 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 886 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 888 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 424 OF 2022 ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1057 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1000 OF 2021ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1441 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1233 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1237 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1044 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1010 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1020 OF 2020 ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 389 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 399 OF 2020ALONGWITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 696 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1431 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 388 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 873 OF 2020ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 281 OF 2021 ---- Mr. Sham V. Walve for Appellant in all Appeals. Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/b PDS Legal for Respondent in ITXA No.1431 of 2020.Mr. Sameer Dalal for Respondent in ITXA No. 844 of 2022 ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & N. R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 30[th] MARCH, 2022 P.C. : 1. Mr. Walve states that the proposed substantial question of law in these appeals are squarely covered in the order of The PrincipalCommissioner of Income Tax – 17 vs. M/s. Moammad Haji Adam & Co.1 andPrincipal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – 4 vs. M/s. ParamshaktiDistributors Pvt. Ltd.2 and therefore the appeals can be disposed.Commissioner of Income Tax – 17 vs. M/s. Moammad Haji Adam & Co.1 andPrincipal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – 4 vs. M/s. ParamshaktiDistributors Pvt. Ltd.2 and therefore the appeals can be disposed. 2.Appeals accordingly disposed. (N. R. BORKAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) 1 Income Tax Appeal No.1004 of 2016 dated 11[th] February, 2019 2 Income Tax Appeal No.413 of 2017 dated 15[th] July, 2019
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan