Case LawHigh Court › Mr. Sham v. N. R. Borkar, Jj

Mr. Sham v. N. R. Borkar, Jj

High Court 06 Apr 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mr. Sham v. N. R. Borkar, Jj
Date of order
06 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. Sham v. N. R. Borkar, Jj, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byPURTIPURTIPRASADPRASADPARABPARABDate:2022.04.0714:35:33+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 642 OF 2021 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 19 Mumbai ….Appellant V/s. Laxman D. Daware …Respondent ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 47 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 855 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 750 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 743 OF 2022 ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 863 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 763 OF 2021ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 452 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1155 OF 2021ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 665 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 649 OF 2021ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 871 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 629 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1187 OF 2021 ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1196 OF 2021ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 197 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 137 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 31 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 188 OF 2022 ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 125 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 847 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 196 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 74 OF 2022ALONGWITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1374 OF 2021 ---- Mr. Sham V. Walve for Appellant in all Appeals.Mr. P. C. Tripathi a/w Mr. Prakash Pandit for Respondent in ITXA No.642 of 2021 and ITXA No.665 of 2022. Ms. Dinkle Hariya for Respondent in ITXA No.47 of 2022. Mr. Jitendra Singh a/w Mr. Om Kandalkar for Respondent in ITXA No. 31 of 2022. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N. R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 6[th] APRIL, 2022 N. R. BORKAR, JJ. P.C. : 1.Mr. Walve states that the proposed substantial questions of law in these appeals are squarely covered by the orders passed by this court in the cases of The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 17 vs. M/s.Moammad Haji Adam & Co.1 and Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – 4 vs. M/s. Paramshakti Distributors Pvt. Ltd.2 and therefore the appeals can be disposed. 2.Appeals accordingly disposed. (N. R. BORKAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) 1 Income Tax Appeal No.1004 of 2016 dated 11[th] February, 2019 2 Income Tax Appeal No.413 of 2017 dated 15[th] July, 2019
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan