Case Law › High Court › Mr. Sham v. N. R. Borkar, Jj

Mr. Sham v. N. R. Borkar, Jj

High Court 22 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

22 Mar 2022

Assessment year(s)

2012-2013

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. Sham v. N. R. Borkar, Jj, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 147 case law →

PURTIPRASADPARAB Digitally signed byPURTI PRASADPARABDate: 2022.03.2417:21:16 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3400 OF 2019 Varun Vimleshkumar Mehta V/s.Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Circle 8(3), Mumbai and Ors. ….Petitioner …Respondents ---- Mr. Devendra H. Jain for Petitioner. Mr. Sham V. Walve for Respondents-Revenue. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & N. R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 22[nd] MARCH, 2022 P.C. : 1. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugning a notice dated 25[th] March 2019 issued under Section 148of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the said Act) informing petitioner that respondents have reasons to believe that petitioner's income chargeable totax for Assessment Year 2012-2013 has escaped assessment within themeaning of Section 147 of the said Act. 2.We have perused the reasons for reopening dated 13[th] March,2019 with the assistance of Mr. Jain. We do not find any error in theexercise of jurisdiction by respondents. 2. 3.Therefore, petition dismissed. (N. R. BORKAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.