Mr. Sham v. Nitin Jamdar, J.j

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 680 OF 2018 Pr. Commissioner of Income Taxv/s. Vijay Arjundas Luthra .. Appellant .. Respondent ALONG WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 749/2017, 776/2017, 834/2017,846/2018, 681/2018, 712/2018, 713/2018, 723/2018, 731/2018,732/2018, 783/2018, 791/2018, 816/2018, 875/2018, 884/2018,890/2018, 891/2018, 901/2018, 908/2018, 928/2018, 828/2018AND 788/18 Mr. Sham V. Walve for the appellant in ITXA Nos. 680/18, 681/18,723/18, 731/18, 732/18, 783/18, 791/18, 816/18, 875/18, 884/18,890/18, 891/18, 901/18, 908/18 and 928/18 Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant in ITXA Nos. 712/18, 713/18,749/17, 776/17, 834/17 and 846/17 Mr. A.R. Malhotra for the appellant in ITXA No. 828/18 Mr. N.N. Singh for the appellant in ITXA No. 788/18 Mr. Atul Jasani for the respondent in ITXA Nos. 712/18, 713/18,723/18, 884/18, and 890/18 Mr. Ruturaj H. Gurjar for the respondent in ITXA Nos.783/18, 791/18and 788/18 Mr. Jay Bhansali for the respondent in ITXA No.828/18 CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, J.J. DATED : 30[th] SEPTEMBER, 2019 P.C. 1.Learned learned Counsel appearing in support of theseappeals, on instructions, seeks to withdraw these appeals. This forthe reason that the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than thethreshold limit prescribed in CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11[th]July, 2018 and revised Circular No.17/2019, dated 8[th] August, 2019. 2. In the above view, these appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.Refund of Court fees as per rules. (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)