Case Law › High Court › Mr. Sham v. N.j. Jamadar, Jj

Mr. Sham v. N.j. Jamadar, Jj

High Court 31 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

31 Jan 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. Sham v. N.j. Jamadar, Jj, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

GAURIAMITGAEKWAD Digitallysigned byGAURI AMITGAEKWADDate:2022.02.0211:01:04+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2441 OF 2019 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central - 2 ….Appellant V/s. Vaayu India Power Corporation Limited ….Respondent ---- Mr. Sham V. Walve for appellant.None for respondent. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & N.J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATED : 31[st] JANUARY 2022 P.C. : 1Mr. Walve states that the tax effect is below the threshold limit and seeks leave to to withdraw the appeal. 2Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fees, if any, in accordance with rules. (N.J. JAMADAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.