In Mr. Sham v. N.j. Jamadar, Jj, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
GAURIAMITGAEKWAD
Digitally signedby GAURIAMITGAEKWADDate:2022.03.0910:43:05 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1900 OF 2017
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 8 ….Appellant
V/s.
Rediff.com India Limited
….Respondent
----
Mr. Sham V. Walve for appellant.None for respondent.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
N.J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATED : 7[th] MARCH 2022
P.C.:
1Mr. Walve states that substantial question of law proposed is
covered by the order dated 29[th] September 2021 in Income Tax Appeal
No.647 of 2017 and therefore, the appeal could be disposed.
2
Appeal accordingly disposed.
(N.J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.