Case Law › High Court › Mr. Sham v. N.j. Jamadar, Jj

Mr. Sham v. N.j. Jamadar, Jj

High Court 31 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

31 Jan 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. Sham v. N.j. Jamadar, Jj, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.292 OF 2020WITH WRIT PETITION NO.294 OF 2020 DishaInfin Consultant Private Limited ….Petitioner V/s. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – 5(1)(2) and Ors. ….Respondents---- Mr. Atul K. Jasani for petitioner. Mr. Sham V. Walve for respondents – Revenue. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & N.J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATED : 31[st] JANUARY 2022 P.C. : WRIT PETITION NO.292 OF 2020WITH WRIT PETITION NO.294 OF 2020 1Mr. Jasani seeks leave to withdraw the petitions with liberty to raise all contentions in appeal to be filed before the concerned authority. 2Petitions dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. (N.J. JAMADAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.