In Mr. Sham v. Walve For, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3072 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3
V/s.
U. K. Jewellers
Mr. Sham V. Walve for Appellant
----
----
….Appellant
…Respondent
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ DATED : 30th NOVEMBER 2021
P.C. :
1Mr. Walve seeks leave to withdraw the appeal since the tax effect is
less than Rs.1 crore.
2Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
3Refund of court fees, if any, in accordance with rules.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.