Mr. Sham Walve For v. Kotwal, Jj. Date :25[Th] April 2019
High Court
25 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mr. Sham Walve For v. Kotwal, Jj. Date :25[Th] April 2019
Date of order
25 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. Sham Walve For v. Kotwal, Jj. Date :25[Th] April 2019, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 3]Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.643 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -24..Appellant VersusShri Jagdish P. Khandelwal..Respondent
Mr. Sham Walve for appellant
CORAM:AKIL KURESHI &SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE :25[th] April 2019.
P.C.
This appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,1961 (the Act) challenge the order passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal (the Tribunal).
2]The learned Counsel for the Revenue, states that he hasbeen instructed not to press this appeal. This for the reason that thetax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs as provided inCBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th] July 2018.
3]Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
4]Refund of court fees, if any, as per Rules.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J)
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue