Case Law › High Court › Mr. Sidhartha Ray, Advocate v. Income Ta...

Mr. Sidhartha Ray, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, ….Opposite Partiesberhampur & Others

High Court 19 Dec 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

19 Dec 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. Sidhartha Ray, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, ….Opposite Partiesberhampur & Others, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty, as prayed for in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.33646 of 2022 ….Petitioner Ashis Kumar Panda Mr. Sidhartha Ray, Advocate -versus- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, ….Opposite PartiesBerhampur & Others Mr. Tushar Kanti Satpathy, Sr. Standing Counsel Mr. Avinash Kedia, Jr. Standing Counsel CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN ORDER19.12.2022 Order No19.12.2022 01. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the appellate authority in accordance with law. If such appeal is filed not later than 1[st]February, 2023, accompanied by an application for condonation of delay explaining the delay on account of the pendency of the present writ petition, it would be considered by the Appellate Authority in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion in the matter. 2. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty, as prayed for in the above terms. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M. S. Raman) Judge MRS/Laxmikant

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.