Case Law › High Court › Mr. Sidhartha Ray, Advocate v. The Princ...

Mr. Sidhartha Ray, Advocate v. The Principal Commissioner Of ….Opposite Partiesincome Tax And Others

High Court 30 Mar 2021 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

30 Mar 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Mr. Sidhartha Ray, Advocate v. The Principal Commissioner Of ….Opposite Partiesincome Tax And Others, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the reasons stated in the application, the prayer for extension of time for filing the appeal is allowed as prayed for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.2850 of 2018 ….Petitioner Smt. Jami Nirmala Mr. Sidhartha Ray, Advocate -versus- The Principal Commissioner of ….Opposite PartiesIncome Tax and Others Mr. R.S. Chimanka Senior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY Order No. I.A. No.12140 of 2021 ORDER 06.09.2021 04. 1. This application has been filed by the Petitioner seeking extension of time to file an appeal in terms of the order of this Court dated 30[th] March, 2021. It is explained that on account of COVID-19 pandemic, the appeal could not be filed before 10[th]May, 2021. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the prayer for extension of time for filing the appeal is allowed as prayed for. The order dated 30[th] March 2021 stands modified to the above extent. The rest of the said order stays as it is. 3. The I.A. is disposed of in the above terms. An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (B.P. Routray) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.