Case Law › High Court › Mr. Sidhartha Ray, Advocatemr. Chitrasen...

Mr. Sidhartha Ray, Advocatemr. Chitrasen Parida, Advocate v. The Principal Commissioner Of ….Respondentincome Tax (Central), Vishakapatnam

High Court 13 Jul 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

13 Jul 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. Sidhartha Ray, Advocatemr. Chitrasen Parida, Advocate v. The Principal Commissioner Of ….Respondentincome Tax (Central), Vishakapatnam, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Consequently, the present appeal is also dismissed both on delay and on merits.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

ITA No.46 of 2022 …. M/s. Nidan Appellant Mr. Sidhartha Ray, AdvocateMr. Chitrasen Parida, Advocate -versus- The Principal Commissioner of ….RespondentIncome Tax (Central), Vishakapatnam Mr. R.S. Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel (IT) CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK Order No. I.A. No.53 of 2022 ORDER13.07.2022 01. 1. There is delay of 1373 days in filing appeal. There is no convincing reason for the inordinate delay and accordingly, the application is dismissed. convincing reason for the inordinate delay and accordingly, the application is dismissed. ITA No.46 of 2022 2. This appeal is by the Assessee against the common order dated 16[th] May, 2018 of the ITAT, Cuttack Bench in I.T. (SS) A No.32 to 37/CTK/2018 for the AYs 2009-10 to 2015-16 only on the ground that the additional ground urged by Assessee was not considered by the ITAT while otherwise allowing its appeal. Today, by a separate order, this Court has dismissed the Revenue’s appeals i.e. ITA Nos.150, 155, 157 to 160 of 2018 and affirmed the aforementioned order of the ITAT. Consequently, the present appeal is also dismissed both on delay and on merits. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R. K. Pattanaik) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.