Mr. Somnath Shukla, Advocate v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Through
High Court
31 Oct 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mr. Somnath Shukla, Advocate v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Through
Date of order
31 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. Somnath Shukla, Advocate v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Through, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on: 21[st] September, 2011
% Date of decision: 31[st] October, 2011
+ ITA NO.610/2010, ITA NO.611/2010, ITA NO.612/2010, ITA NO.898/2010 & ITA NO.900/2010
All titled as:
…..Appellant
DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL
Through:
Mr. Ajay Vohra, Advocate with
Ms. Kavita Jha, Advocate and
Mr. Somnath Shukla, Advocate.
-versus-
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Through:
.....Respondent
Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? No. the Judgment? No.
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No.
3. Whether the Judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes. the Digest? Yes.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
For orders see ITA No.345/2009.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
OCTOBER 31, 2011
mk
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue