Mr. Sunil Kapur v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
19 Dec 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mr. Sunil Kapur v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
19 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Mr. Sunil Kapur v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4575 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2624 OF 2007
Mr. Sunil Kapur .... Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Respondent
Mrs.B. Pillai i/by D.M. Harish & Co. for the
Appellant.
Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Ms. P.P. Bhosale for
the Respondent.
(Only Notice of Motion, No R & P in Court)
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: DECEMBER 19, 2007
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: DECEMBER 19, 2007
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard both parties.
2. This Notice of Motion has been filed for
condonation of 15 days delay in filing the main
appeal. On perusal of the affidavit in support of
the Notice of Motion, we find that the delay has
been sought to be explained. In view of the cause
shown, we propose to accept the cause shown for
condonation of delay subject to levy of costs.
Notice of Motion is therefore, allowed and the delay
in filing the appeal stands condoned subject to
payment of costs of Rs.2500/- which is to be paid
directly to the respondents within a period of six
weeks from today.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.