Case Law › High Court › Mr. T.k. Satapathy, Senior Standing Coun...

Mr. T.k. Satapathy, Senior Standing Counsel v. Orissa Forest Development

High Court 17 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

17 Feb 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. T.k. Satapathy, Senior Standing Counsel v. Orissa Forest Development, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: Leaving the questions of law open for decision in some other cases, the appeal is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Order No. 07. S. Behera IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No. 86 of 2011 Commissioner of Income Tax Appellant …. Mr. T.K. Satapathy, Senior Standing Counsel -versus- Orissa Forest Development Respondent …. Corporation Limited CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK ORDER 17.02.2022 1. Neither the charges have been deposited by the Appellant nor have the paper books been prepared. No steps have obviously been taken in the last over ten years in this appeal. 2. Leaving the questions of law open for decision in some other cases, the appeal is disposed of. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R. K. Pattanaik) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.