In Mr. T.k. Satpathy, Senior Standing Counsel v. Respondentnone, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No.133 of 2018
….Appellant
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax.
Mr. T.K. Satpathy, Senior Standing Counsel
-versus-
….
RespondentNone
M/s. Dewdrop Merchants Pvt. Ltd.
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER 13.04.2022
Order No. 13.04.2022 1. In view of the decision of this Court dated 5[th] April, 2022 in ITA No.132 of 2018 (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Ahinsa Vinimay Pvt. Ltd.), the Court declines to frame the questions of law urged by the Revenue in the present appeal arising out of the impugned order dated 19[th] April, 2018 in IT (ss) A No.42/CTK/2018 for the Assessment Year 2008-2009.
02.
2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman)
Judge S.K. Jena/Secy.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.