Mr. T.k. Satpathy, Sr. Standing Counsel v. M/S. Subham Estcon Private Ltd
High Court
24 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr. T.k. Satpathy, Sr. Standing Counsel v. M/S. Subham Estcon Private Ltd
Date of order
24 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. T.k. Satpathy, Sr. Standing Counsel v. M/S. Subham Estcon Private Ltd, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Order No.
06.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
I.T.A. No.88 of 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar
Appellant
….
Mr. T.K. Satpathy, Sr. Standing Counsel
-versus-
Respondent
M/s. Subham Estcon Private Ltd.
….
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK
ORDER24.02.2022
1. The present appeal by the Department arises from an order dated 11[th] May, 2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack (ITAT) in IT(SS)A No.120/CTK/2011 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2007-08.
2. The question of law sought to be urged by the Department concerns the deletion of an addition made by the AO on account of suppression of sales.
3. There is a detailed discussion in para 19 of the impugned order of the ITAT where for the AY in question the amount of income to be taxed is reduced to Rs.1.5 crores as against Rs.3.20 crores “being a double taxation effect given to the income brought to tax by the AO under Sections 144/153A.”
4. The conclusion reached by the ITAT in this regard appears to be perfectly legal, not warranting interference.
Page 1 of 2
KC Bisoi
// 2 //
5. No substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.