Mr. Tulsiram R. Rander v. The Income Tax Officer Ward-14(2
High Court
28 Aug 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mr. Tulsiram R. Rander v. The Income Tax Officer Ward-14(2
Date of order
28 Aug 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. Tulsiram R. Rander v. The Income Tax Officer Ward-14(2, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 449 OF 2015
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1219 OF 2008
Mr. Tulsiram R. Rander
Vs.
The Income Tax Officer Ward-14(2)
..Applicant
..Respondent
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 450 OF 2015
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1220 OF 2008
Mr. Tulsiram R. Rander (HUF)..Applicant
Vs.The Commissioner of Income Tax-II..Respondent
....
Mr. Nishant Gandhi, Advocate i/b Vipul Joshi for Applicant.Mr. P.C. Chhotaray, Advocate for Respondents.
....CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.DATED : 28 AUGUST 2015
P.C.:
Both these Notices of Motion have been taken out by theapplicants one as an individual and other as Karta of an HinduUndivided Family seeking early disposal of the appeals filed by theapplicants before this Court.
1 / 2
2.The affidavit in support points out that the applicant is asenior citizen 76 years of age and also not keeping good health. Inview of the above, both these notices of motion are allowed in termsof Prayer Clause (A).
3.The learned Counsel appearing for parties consent to boththe appeals being listed on board for final hearing in the weekcommencing from 14 September 2015.
[G.S. KULKARNI, J]
[M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.