Mr. Y v. Mr. A. Shankar, Learned Senior Counsel, Mr
High Court
27 Nov 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Mr. Y v. Mr. A. Shankar, Learned Senior Counsel, Mr
Date of order
27 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. Y v. Mr. A. Shankar, Learned Senior Counsel, Mr, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S. SANJAY GOWDA I.T.A.NO.100063 OF 2015
BETWEEN
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AAYAKAR BHAVAN SEDUM ROAD, KALABURAGI-585105. AAYAKAR BHAVAN SEDUM ROAD, KALABURAGI-585105.
2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1
BELAGAVI.
(BY SRI. Y V RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE)
... APPELLANTS
AND
SHRI H.RAGHAVENDRA RAO, PROP.M.S. RAGHAVENDRA AGENCIES Y.D. COMPOUND, OPP. ROTARY HALL, COLLEGE ROAD, HOSPET, PAN: .
(BY SRI. A SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL, MR. S. ANNAMALAI, ADVOCATE AND MR. H. R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATE)
... RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI IN ITA.NO.308/PNJ/2013, DATED:19.12.2014 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BELGAUM.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE, J, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Mr. Y. V. Raviraj, learned counsel for appellant.
2.Mr. A. Shankar, learned senior counsel, Mr.
S. Annamalai, Mr. H. R. Kambiyavar, learned counsel for respondents.
3.In view of the Circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the learned counsel for the revenue seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-JUDGE
yan
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue