M.ranjan v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8 Vi Floor, Kannammai Buildings
High Court
13 Apr 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
M.ranjan v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8 Vi Floor, Kannammai Buildings
Date of order
13 Apr 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In M.ranjan v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8 Vi Floor, Kannammai Buildings, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the same, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn and it is open to the petitioner to file civil suit, in accordance with law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.04.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLEMR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.3030 of 2017 &W.M.P.No.2960 of 2017
M.Ranjan
.. Petitioner
v.
1 The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-8 VI Floor, Kannammai Buildings No.116, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 006
2 The joint Commissioner of Income Tax Vellore Range No.2, Barracks Road, Officers Line Vellore 632 001
3 The Income Tax Officer (Hqrs) DDO O/o.Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-8 VI Floor, Kannammai Buildings No.611 Anna Salai Chennai 632 001
.. Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
issue a Writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the 3rd respondent by two proceedings in S.F.No.Misc./CIT-8/2016-17, dated 02.12.2016 and ending with the two proceedings in S.F.No.Misc./CIT-8/2016-17, dated 31.01.2017 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to operate the vehicles for full period of the contracts dated 01.06.2015, 01.07.2015, 01.02.2016 and 01.08.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saravana Sowmiyan
For Respondents : Ms.Pushpa
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a civil suit. The learned counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the same, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn and it is open to the petitioner to file civil suit, in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
13.04.2017
Index : Yes/No
Rj
To
1 The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-8 VI Floor, Kannammai Buildings No.116, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 006 VI Floor, Kannammai Buildings No.116, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 006
2 The joint Commissioner of Income Tax Vellore Range No.2, Barracks Road, Officers Line Vellore 632 001 Vellore Range No.2, Barracks Road, Officers Line Vellore 632 001
3 The Income Tax Officer (Hqrs) DDO O/o.Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-8 VI Floor, Kannammai Buildings No.611 Anna Salai Chennai 632 001
M.DURAISWAMY, J,
Rj
W.P.No.3030 of 2017 &W.M.P.No.2960 of 2017
13.04.2017
http://www.judis.nic.in
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.