Case LawHigh Court › Mr.ashok K.manchanda, Sr.standing v. Lak...

Mr.ashok K.manchanda, Sr.standing v. Lakhmi Chand

High Court 01 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mr.ashok K.manchanda, Sr.standing v. Lakhmi Chand
Date of order
01 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr.ashok K.manchanda, Sr.standing v. Lakhmi Chand, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal.

Decision: Recording the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of, without examining the issue/question raised.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 1124/2017 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through : Counsel. Mr.Ashok K.Manchanda, Sr.Standing versus LAKHMI CHAND ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 01.10.2018 CM APPL. 44660/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions ITA 1124/2017 Learned Senior Standing counsel for the appellant/Revenue states that the tax effect involved in this appeal is below Rs.50,00,000/- and hence in terms of circular No.3/2018 dated 11.7.2018 the appeal may be disposed of without answering the issue/question raised. Recording the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of, without examining the issue/question raised. We clarify that the issue/question is left open. We also grant liberty to the Revenue to file an application for revival of the present appeal, if it is found that the case is covered by an exception. In view of the order passed above, the date of hearing fixed in the matter i.e.16.10.2018 will be treated as cancelled. SANJIV KHANNA, J. OCTOBER 01, 2018/sa CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan