Case Law › High Court › Mr.b.panda, Advocate v. Income Tax Offic...

Mr.b.panda, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Ward

High Court 07 Feb 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

07 Feb 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr.b.panda, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Ward, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No.20 of 2009 Shree Om Industries …. Appellant Mr.B.Panda, Advocate Order No. -versus- …. Respondents Income Tax Officer, Ward No.1, Rourkela & Others Mr. S.S.Mohapatra, Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department . CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK ORDER 07.02.2022 06. 1. Learned counsel for the Appellant states that he has no instructions. 2. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice Kabita/Tudu ( R.K.Pattanaik) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.