Case LawHigh Court › Mr.dharan v. Wp 2615-18 And Ors -O

Mr.dharan v. Wp 2615-18 And Ors -O

High Court 22 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mr.dharan v. Wp 2615-18 And Ors -O
Date of order
22 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr.dharan v. Wp 2615-18 And Ors -O, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2615 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2616 OF 2018 WITHWRIT PETITION NO.2700 OF 2018 WITHWRIT PETITION NO.2605 OF 2018 WITHWRIT PETITION NO.2613 OF 2018 WITHWRIT PETITION NO.2647 OF 2018 Vikrant S. Chougule V/s. Income-tax Officer-6(3)(2) and anr. … Petitioner … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2617 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2620 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2621 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2623 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2612 OF 2018 WITHWRIT PETITION NO.2618 OF 2018 Sham G. Chougule V/s. Income-tax Officer-6(3)(2) and anr. … Petitioner … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2622 OF 2018 WITH Priya Soparkar WRIT PETITION NO.2662 OF 2018WITHWRIT PETITION NO.2598 OF 2018WITHWRIT PETITION NO.2604 OF 2018WITHWRIT PETITION NO.2607 OF 2018WITHWRIT PETITION NO.2624 OF 2018 Ranjit S. Chougule V/s. Income-tax Officer-6(3)(2) and anr. … Petitioner … Respondents --- Mr.Dharan V. Gandhi for the Petitioners.Mr.N.C.Mohanty for the Respondent. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 22, 2018. P.C.:- 1.This group of petitions involve similar issues. Some of thepetitions were to come up on board on 24[th] November, 2018.Learned Advocates for the parties, however, requested that thesame may be taken up today. We have accepted the request andgot the papers called before us. Learned counsel for the Petitionerssubmitted that after filing the petitions, the Competent Authority Priya Soparkar has withdrawn the impugned orders passed under Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. He, therefore, sought permission towithdraw all the petitions. Permission granted. Petitions disposedof as withdrawn. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.) ….
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan