Case LawHigh Court › Mr.jagabandhu Sahoo, Sr. Advocate Along...

Mr.jagabandhu Sahoo, Sr. Advocate Along With Ms.kajal Sahoo, Advocate v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi And Another

High Court 11 Jul 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr.jagabandhu Sahoo, Sr. Advocate Along With Ms.kajal Sahoo, Advocate v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi And Another
Date of order
11 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Mr.jagabandhu Sahoo, Sr. Advocate Along With Ms.kajal Sahoo, Advocate v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi And Another, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 147, Section 154 of the Income-tax Act.

Decision: 5.In view of the aforesaid conceded position, there remains nothing for adjudication in the present writ petition, and, hence, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.18278 of 2025 M/s. Regulated Market Committee, Attabira, represented by Shri Sasanka Sekhar Sahani, Sambalpur ….Petitioner Mr.Jagabandhu Sahoo, Sr. Advocate along with Ms.Kajal Sahoo, Advocate -versus- Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi and another …. Opposite Parties Mr.Avinash Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel (Income Tax Department) CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMANORDER 11.07.2025 Order No. 01. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Questioning the propriety of computation sheet dated 31[st]May, 2025 as enclosed to assessment order passed under Section 147 read with Section 260 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 pertaining to assessment year 2017-18 (relevant financial year 2016-17), vide Annexure-7, the petitioner has approached this Court craving to invoke the provisions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. 3.When the matter is taken up, Shri Avinash Kedia, learned Junior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department, furnishing copy of an order dated 30[th] June, 2025 passed by the Income Tax Officer, Bargarh Ward, Bargarh under Section 154 of said Act, submitted that upon production of details of documents and bank statements in support of claim by the petitioner-assesse pursuant to order of remit by this Court vide order dated 30[th]April, 2025 in W.P. (C) No.10602 of 2025, the Assessing Officer has rectified mistake apparent from the record in computation of tax under Section 234-A and Section 234-B of the Income Tax Act and modified the computation as follows: “Since the computation of tax u/s 234A & U/s 234B is a mistake apparent from the record, the same is rectified u/s.154 of I.T. Act, 1961. The tax is recomputed/modified as under: Total income : Nil Total tax surcharge and E.C. thereon : Nil Add: Interest u/s 234A : Nil Interest u/s234B : Nil Total tax and interest payable : Nil Net amount payable/refundable : Nil The order u/s. 154 of the Act is passed. Issued copy of rectification order to the assesse accordingly. S/d- (Hemanta Kumar Pradhan) Income Tax Officer Bargarh Ward, Bargarh” 4.Shri Jagabandhu Sahoo, learned Senior Advocate along with Ms. Kajal Sahoo, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on perusal of such order, conceded that the relief claimed by way of the writ petition has been meted out. 5.In view of the aforesaid conceded position, there remains nothing for adjudication in the present writ petition, and, hence, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. 6.Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, are disposed of accordingly. (Harish Tandon) Chief Justice (M.S. Raman) Judge Bichi Signature Not Verified Digitally SignedSigned by: BICHITRANANDA SAHOODesignation: SecretaryReason: AuthenticationLocation: Orissa High CourtDate: 14-Jul-2025 11:19:53
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan