Mr.kisan Brijmohan Pokhriyal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1
High Court
13 Apr 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Mr.kisan Brijmohan Pokhriyal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1
Date of order
13 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Mr.kisan Brijmohan Pokhriyal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Considering that the order visits the petitioner with civil consequences, the impugned order dated 6th February, 2009 is quashed and set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2519 OF 2009
Mr.Kisan Brijmohan Pokhriyal...Petitioner
Vs.
Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1)
Kalyan & Ors. ..Respondent
Shri M.S.Lagu, for the Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Bhatnagar with Mr. N.R. Prajapati,
for the respondents.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO &J.H. BHATIA, JJ.DATED: 13th April, 2009
CORAM: F.I.
J.H. BHATIA, JJ.
DATED: 13th April, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Rule. Heard forthwith.
2. The petitioner impugns the order dated 6th
February, 2009 on several grounds. One of the
grounds raised is that the application for stay was
dismissed without hearing the petitioner and as such
the same suffers from violation of principles of
natural justice and fair play as also CBDT
Circulars. Considering that the order visits the
petitioner with civil consequences, the impugned
order dated 6th February, 2009 is quashed and set
aside.
3. On behalf of the petitioner, learned Counsel
submits that he will be approaching the C.I.T. (A)
(-2-)
praying for stay. Considering that, the respondent
No.1 is directed not to take steps for a period of
eight weeks from today to enable the petitioner to
move C.I.T. (A) for stay and for any other reliefs
thereafter. With the above observation Rule made
absolute accodingly. No oder as to costs.
(J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.