Mr.krishnachetty Vijaykumar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.11.2024 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHand THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.A.No.3209 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.24854 of 2024 Mr.Krishnachetty Vijaykumar vs .... Appellant 1. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Non Corp Circle 2, No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 018. Coimbatore – 641 018. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 018. Coimbatore – 641 018. 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 1 No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 018..... Respondents Prayer : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against order dated 10.04.2022 passed in W.P.No.5305 of 2022 on the file of this Court. For Appellant:Mr.M.Dinesh for Mr.M.Natarajan For Respondent : Dr.B.Ramaswamy Senior Standing Counsel Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN,J.JUDGMENT(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J) We have heard Mr.M.Dinesh, learned counsel for the appellant and Dr.B.Ramaswamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. We see no reason to intervene in the order passed by the learned single Judge in view of the statement recorded at paragraph 3 of the impugned order to the effect that the petitioner was ready to pay 10% of the demand in two instalments within a period of two months. 3. Thus, we see no infirmity in the learned Judge making such payments as a pre-condition to directing the appellate authority to dispose the petitioner's appeal, and we thus see no reason to entertain the petitioner's request for waiving of the requirement to pay the instalments. 4. This Writ Appeal is dismissed as is the connected Miscellaneous Petition. No costs. slIndex:Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/NoSpeaking order/non-speaking order [A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J]25.11.2024 W.A.No.3209 of 2024and C.M.P.No.24854 of 2024