Mr.m.m.shanmugasundaram v. The Income Tax Officer,Circle Area, Mudichur Road,Tambaram, Chennai
High Court
23 Oct 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Mr.m.m.shanmugasundaram v. The Income Tax Officer,Circle Area, Mudichur Road,Tambaram, Chennai
Date of order
23 Oct 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Mr.m.m.shanmugasundaram v. The Income Tax Officer,Circle Area, Mudichur Road,Tambaram, Chennai, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 23.10.2017CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAMW.P.No.35538 of 2007
Mr.M.M.Shanmugasundaram
... Petitioner
Versus
The Income Tax Officer,Circle Area, Mudichur Road,Tambaram, Chennai.
... Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India praying for issuance of writ of mandamusdirecting the respondent herein to pay a sum of Rs.1,65,362/-with reasonable interest.For Petitioner : Mr.B.DhansekaranFor Respondent : Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Standing Counsel O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitionersubmitted that the prayer in the writ petition has becomeinfructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. Recording the endorsement, this Writ Petition isdismissed as infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(J)
//True Copy//mrr
Sub Assistant Registrar
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
To
The Income Tax Officer,Circle Area, Mudichur Road,Tambaram, Chennai.
+1cc to Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Advocate, S.R.No.74945
W.P.No.35538 of 2007
MP(CO)CA(13/11/2017)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue