Mr.mukesh Gupta, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer Ward 45 (4
High Court
21 Oct 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mr.mukesh Gupta, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer Ward 45 (4
Date of order
21 Oct 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr.mukesh Gupta, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer Ward 45 (4, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 8.Recording the aforesaid undertaking, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~5
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 7555/2020
RIPS CONSULTANCY SERVICES
...... Petitioner
Through:
Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 45 (4)
...... Respondent
Through:
Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, with
Ms. Mansie Jain and Mr. Chandratanay Chaube, Advocates.
Date of Decision: 21[st] October, 2020
%
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
J U D G M E N T
MANMOHAN, J: (Oral)
1.The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2.Present writ petition had been filed seeking grant of refund determined under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-19 and 2019-20 along with interest under Section 244A of the Act.
3.In the present petition, it had been averred that the respondent contrary to the mandatory language of Section 143(1)(e) of the Act had not released the refunds determined under Section 143(1) of the Act for Assessment Years 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 and that too without giving any reasons.
Page 1 of 2
4.On the last date of hearing, Mr. Ruchir Bhaita, learned counsel for respondent had taken time to obtain instructions.
5.Today, learned counsel for petitioner admits that the petitioner has received the refund sought for in the present petition. He, however, states that no interest has been paid till date of payment under Section 244A of the Act.
6.Learned counsel for respondent assures and undertakes to this Court that the petitioner’s request for payment of interest under Section 244A of the Act shall be processed by respondent no.2 within eight weeks in accordance with law. 7.The undertaking given by learned counsel for the respondent is accepted by this Court and respondent is held bound by the same.
8.Recording the aforesaid undertaking, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
9.The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.
MANMOHAN, J
OCTOBER 21, 2020 AS
SANJEEV NARULA, J
Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.