Mr.nachimuthu Sureshkumar v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
04 Oct 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Mr.nachimuthu Sureshkumar v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
04 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr.nachimuthu Sureshkumar v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.No.25906 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 04.10.2024
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
W.P.No.25906 of 2023and
W.M.P.Nos.25348 & 25349 of 2023
Mr.Nachimuthu Sureshkumar
...Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Income Tax Department,
PCIT, Coimbatore – 1, Coimbatore – 641 018.
2. The Income Tax Officer/Assessing Officer,
Income Tax Department,
National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi.... Respondents
Prayer:This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent by proceedings in Revision No.PCIT, Coimbatore -1/Revision – 264/100000311045/2022 in PAN : dated 18.01.2023 and the Order of the second respondent by proceedings in PAN : , Assessment year 2017-18 dated 25.03.2022 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saravana Sowmiyan
For Respondents : Dr.B.Ramaswamy
Senior Standing Counsel
ORDER
By consent, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. Challenging Impugned proceedings of the first respondent in
Revision No.PCIT, Coimbatore -1/Revision – 264/100000311045/2022 in PAN : dated 18.01.2023 and the Order of the second respondent by proceedings in PAN : , Assessment year 2017-18 dated 25.03.2022, the present Writ Petition has been filed.
3. Though larger relief has been sought in the Writ petition, the petitioner has restricted his relief and the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that it is suffice if liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority for which the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection.
6. Considering the above submissions made by the learned counsel on
W.P.No.25906 of 2023
either side and in view of the no objection for granting liberty to the petitioner
for filling the appeal, Writ Petition is dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the appellate authority shall entertain the appeal without insisting on delay aspect, if it is otherwise in order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
04.10.2024
Speaking/Non-speaking orderIndex : Yes / NoNeutral Citation : Yes / Novrc
To
1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax Department, PCIT, Coimbatore – 1, Coimbatore – 641 018.
2. The Income Tax Officer/Assessing Officer, Income Tax Department, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi.
4/4
W.P.No.25906 of 2023
Krishnan Ramasamy, J.
vrc
W.P.No.25906 of 2023
04.10.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.