In Mr.r.s. Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel v. Paradeep Parivahan Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: In that view of the matter leaving the substantial question of law open for decision in some other appropriate case, the appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Order No.
03.
KC Bisoi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ITA No.116 of 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Cuttack
….
Appellant
Mr.R.S. Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel
-versus-
….
Paradeep Parivahan Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK
ORDER
10.02.2022
In the last over eight years, the Respondent has remained unserved. In that view of the matter leaving the substantial question of law open for decision in some other appropriate case, the appeal is disposed of.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.