In Mrs. Aruna Anand v. Settlement Commission Income-Tax And Another, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
****
C.W.P. No.4088 of 1992
Date of Decision:26.04.2013
Mrs. Aruna Anand
Vs.
.....Petitioner
Settlement Commission Income-tax and another
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:-
None for the petitioner.
Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate for the respondent.
****
HEMANT GUPTA, J.(Oral)
For order, see common order passed today in C.W.P. No.3885of 1992 – Surinder Kumar v. Income-tax Settlement Commission andanother.
( HEMANT GUPTA )
JUDGE
April 26, 2013renu
( RITU BAHRI ) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.