Case LawHigh Court › Mrs. S v. And A.a. Sayed, Jj

Mrs. S v. And A.a. Sayed, Jj

High Court 21 Nov 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mrs. S v. And A.a. Sayed, Jj
Date of order
21 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mrs. S v. And A.a. Sayed, Jj, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1358 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-5-Versus-M/s. Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. ..Appellant ..Respondent ........... Mrs. S. V. Bharucha for the Appellant. Dr. K. Shivram, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Rahul Hakani & Paras Savla for the Respondents. ........... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE :- 21ST NOVEMBER, 2014 P.C.: This Appeal by the Revenue challenges the order passed on 16[th] May, 2012 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, in Income Tax Appeal No.6413/Mum/2010. The assessment year in question is 2007-08. The only question of law and which is termed as substantial in this Appeal is conceded to be covered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee by the order referred to in para-3 of the impugned order. In other words, the order passed by this Court has been accepted by the Revenue. In such circumstances, the Appeal need not be entertained. It is dismissed. (A. A. SAYED, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan