Mr.sandeep v. Dated :June 28, 2019
High Court
28 Jun 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Mr.sandeep v. Dated :June 28, 2019
Date of order
28 Jun 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr.sandeep v. Dated :June 28, 2019, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: The Contempt Petition to stand disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
rpa1/13-cpst-33707-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION (ST.) NO.33707 OF 2017
Naipal Singh
Vs.Ajay Bhushan Pandey (IAS) & Ors.
.. Petitioner
.. Respondents
…...
Mr.Sandeep V. Marne, Advocate for the Petitioner.Ms.Neeta Masurakar a/w. Rui Rodriges and Nieyaati Masurkar, Advocate for the Respondents.
…...
CORAM : A.A. SAYED AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATED :JUNE 28, 2019.
P.C.:
We are informed that the Petitioner is due for superannuation on 30[th] June, 2019. Pursuant to the orders of this Court, the Petitioner has been granted two promotions and now one notional promotion of the Petitioner as Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax will have to be granted.
2We direct the Respondents to pursue the matter and grant the aforesaid notional promotion expeditiously.
3Since the order of which breach is alleged is substantially complied with, no contempt action is now warranted. The Contempt Petition to stand disposed of.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue