Case LawHigh Court › Mr.selvam Rajesh v. The Income Tax Offic...

Mr.selvam Rajesh v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, 1[St] Floor, Kancheepuram-Income Tax Office

High Court 20 Nov 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Mr.selvam Rajesh v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, 1[St] Floor, Kancheepuram-Income Tax Office
Date of order
20 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Mr.selvam Rajesh v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, 1[St] Floor, Kancheepuram-Income Tax Office, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Issue: Further, the appellate authority shall decide as to whether there is valid or proper https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis2/4 W.P.

Decision: The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

W.P. No.10692 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.11.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P. No.10692 of 2024 and W.M.P. Nos.11781 and 11782 of 2024 Mr.Selvam Rajesh ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, 1[st] Floor, Kancheepuram-Income Tax Office, No.96, Munuswamy Mudaliar Avenue, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu-631 501. 2.The Assistant Director of Income Tax, Centralized Processing Center, Income Tax Department, Prestige Alpha, Beratena Agrahara, Electronic City, Hosur Road, Bengaluru-560 500. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in Order W.P. No.10692 of 2024 No.ITBA/AST/S/144/2019-20/1021967444(1) dated 09.12.2019 on the file of the 1[st] Respondent relating to AY.2017-18 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.I.Dinesh For Respondents : Mr.D.Prabhu Mukunth Arunkumar Junior Standing Counsel ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the order dated 09.12.2019. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the same is challenged on the ground that the notice and the order were not served on the petitioner, however he would confine his prayer seeking liberty of this Court to permit him to file an appeal within a period of two weeks, which was not seriously objected to by the learned counsel for the Respondents. 2. In view thereof, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If such appeal is filed within the stipulated time (i.e.,) two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the same shall be entertained by the appellate authority without reference to limitation subject to the petitioner complying with all other conditions including pre-deposit. Further, the appellate authority shall decide as to whether there is valid or proper https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis2/4 W.P. No.10692 of 2024 service as a preliminary issue and then proceed to pass orders in accordance with law. 4. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 20.11.2024 Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderIndex : Yes/ No Neutral Citation: Yes/Nomka To: 1.The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, 1[st] Floor, Kancheepuram-Income Tax Office, No.96, Munuswamy Mudaliar Avenue, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu-631 501. 2.The Assistant Director of Income Tax, Centralized Processing Center, Income Tax Department, Prestige Alpha, Beratena Agrahara, Electronic City, Hosur Road, Bengaluru-560 500. W.P. No.10692 of 2024 MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. mka W.P. No.10692 of 2024 20.11.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan