Case Law › High Court › Mr.sham v. A.k.menon, J

Mr.sham v. A.k.menon, J

High Court 29 Nov 2017 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

29 Nov 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr.sham v. A.k.menon, J, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

SKN 1/1 1449.17-nma IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1449 OF 2017 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 1360 OF 2017 The Commissioner of Income Tax-(E), Mumbai.…Applicant.V/s.Prithviraj Kapoor Memorial Trust and Research Foundation.…Respondent. Mr.Sham V. Walve for the applicant.Mr.Sameer Dalal for the respondent. CORAM :A.S.OKA AND A.K.MENON, JJ.DATE :29[th] November 2017. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the parties. In view of the averments made in the affidavit in support of the notice of motion, sufficient cause is made out to condone delay of 19 days. Hence, notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.K.MENON, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.