Case LawHigh Court › Mr.sham v. Dated :18[Th] July 2017

Mr.sham v. Dated :18[Th] July 2017

High Court 18 Jul 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mr.sham v. Dated :18[Th] July 2017
Date of order
18 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr.sham v. Dated :18[Th] July 2017, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDITION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.448 OF 2015WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.461 OF 2015 The Commissioner of Income-Tax-TDS, Pune ...AppellantV/s.KSB Pumps Ltd. ...Respondent ..... Mr.Sham V. Walve, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr.R.Murlidhar with Mr.Balasaheb Yewale I/by M/s.Rajesh Shah& Co., Advocate for the Respondent. .... CORAM :S.V.GANGAPURWALA &A.M.BADAR JJ. DATED :18[th] July 2017. P.C. 1The learned counsel for the Appellant fairly concedesthat the Tribunal has decided the Appeals based on the Order inthe Assessee's own case for the earlier Assessment year. TheAppellant has filed Appeals against the Order of the Tribunal forthe Assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09 raising the similarquestion of law and this Court on 31[st] January 2017 has dismissedthe said Appeals bearing Income-tax Appeal No.1399 of 2014 and1511 of 2014. 2In light of that, no substantial question arises. Appealsas such are dismissed. No costs. ( A.M.BADAR J.) ( S.V.GANGAPURWALA J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan