In Mr.sham v. Dated, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: 3The Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDITION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.803 OF 2015
Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax-25, Mumbai …AppellantV/s.
M/s.Joshi Brothers
...Respondent
.....
Mr.Sham V. Walve, Advocate for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
....
CORAM :S.V.GANGAPURWALA &A.M.BADAR JJ.
DATED :
3[rd] August 2017.
P.C.
1The present Appeal is for the Assessment year 2008-09.In this Appeal, the tax effect is less than Rs.20 Lakhs.
2In light of the above and in view of the CBDT CircularNo.21/2015 dated 10/12/2015, the Department has taken policydecision not to prosecute the appeals where the tax effect is lessthan Rs.20 Lakhs. The learned counsel for the Appellant seeksleave to withdraw the Appeal.
3The Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.4Court fees as per rules be refunded.
( A.M.BADAR J.)
( S.V.GANGAPURWALA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue