Mrs.meenadevi Manakavalan v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
08 Nov 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Mrs.meenadevi Manakavalan v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
08 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mrs.meenadevi Manakavalan v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P.Nos.5101 and 5102 of 2022
and
W.M.P.Nos.5215, 5218, 5219 and 5220 of 2022
M/s.Sun Land Properties Private Limited,
Represented by its Director
Mrs.Meenadevi Manakavalan
... Petitioner in both W.Ps
Vs.
1.The Income Tax Officer,
Corporate Ward-6(3),
Wanapathy Block,
No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Chennai – 600 034.
2.The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant
Commissioner of Income Tax/Income-tax Officer,
National Faceless Assessment Centre,
Delhi.
3.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,
Corporate Range-3,
No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Chennai – 600 034.
... Respondents in both W.Ps
Prayer in W.P.No.5101 of 2022: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records
in PAN: and quash the Impugned Notice in
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.5101 and 5102 of 2022
ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-2021/1032093268(1) issued on 31.03.2021 passed by the first respondent and the consequential proceedings in ITBA/AST/F/17/2021-2022/1039817582(1) dated 16.02.2022 passed by the second respondent as illegal and without jurisdiction.
Prayer in W.P.No.5102 of 2022: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in PAN: and quash the Impugned Notice in ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-2021/1032089403(1) issued on 31.03.2021 passed by the first respondent and the consequential proceedings in ITBA/AST/F/17/2021-2022/1039815981(1) dated 16.02.2022 passed by the second respondent as illegal and without jurisdiction.
For Petitioner: Ms.Vandana Vyas(In both W.Ps)
For Respondents
: Mrs.S.Premalatha
(In both W.Ps) Junior Standing Counsel
COMMON ORDER
These Writ Petitions have been filed for a Certiorari, to call for the records in PAN: and quash the Impugned Notice in ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-2021/1032089403(1) and the Impugned Notice in ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-2021/1032089403(1) of the first respondent both dated 31.03.2021 and the consequential proceedings in ITBA/AST/F/17/2021-
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.5101 and 5102 of 2022
2022/1039815981(1) and in ITBA/AST/F/17/2021-2022/1039815981(1) both dated 16.02.2022 passed by the second respondent.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner confirms that orders flowing from the Impugned Notices in these Writ Petitions both dated 31.03.2021 are now before the Appellate Commissioner under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Considering the same, these Writ Petitions are closed with liberty to the petitioner to raise all objections that are available in law before the Appellate Commissioner. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed.
08.11.2024
Index : Yes/NoInternet : Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non-Speaking OrderNeutral Citation : Yes/No
arb
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
To
1.The Income Tax Officer,
Corporate Ward-6(3), Wanapathy Block, No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai – 600 034.
2.The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant
Commissioner of Income Tax/Income-tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi.
3.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,
Corporate Range-3, No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Chennai – 600 034.
W.P.Nos.5101 and 5102 of 2022
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.5101 and 5102 of 2022
C.SARAVANAN, J.
arb
W.P.Nos.5101 and 5102 of 2022
andW.M.P.Nos.5215, 5218, 5219 and 5220 of 2022
08.11.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.