Mrs.m.m. Deshmukh, App For The State/Respondent v. Kotwal, Jj.date: 03[Rd] July, 2018
High Court
03 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Mrs.m.m. Deshmukh, App For The State/Respondent v. Kotwal, Jj.date: 03[Rd] July, 2018
Date of order
03 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mrs.m.m. Deshmukh, App For The State/Respondent v. Kotwal, Jj.date: 03[Rd] July, 2018, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.996 OF 2018
INCRIMINAL APPEAL NO.298 OF 2017
The Commissioner of Income Taxversus
.... Applicant
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.... Respondents
…....
Mr.P.A. Narayanan, Advocate for the Applicant.Mr.P.A. Narayanan, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mrs.M.M. Deshmukh, APP for the State/Respondent No.1.Mrs.M.M. Deshmukh, APP for the State/Respondent No.1.
Ms.Aanchal Aggarwal i/b. Nankani Associates for Respondent No.2.Ms.Aanchal Aggarwal i/b. Nankani Associates for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI &SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.DATE: 03[rd] JULY, 2018.
P.C. :
1. This is an Application for serving the Respondent No.3
by substituted service. For the reasons recorded in theApplication, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause(a). The returnable date would be 31/07/2018. Application, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause(a). The returnable date would be 31/07/2018.
2. The notice to be published in the newspaper asmentioned in prayer clause (a), within a period of two weeks.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (B. R. GAVAI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.