Mrs.m.sakunthala v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-I Madurai
High Court
16 Sep 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Mrs.m.sakunthala v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-I Madurai
Date of order
16 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mrs.m.sakunthala v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-I Madurai, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence,the writ petition is dismissed for default.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.No.35027 of 2003
MRS.M.SAKUNTHALA
Vs
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-I MADURAI
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) CENTRAL II NUNGAMBAKKAM CHENNAI - 34
3. THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER CENTRAL MADURAI ... RESPONDENTS
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India toissue a Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the recordsconnected with the order of attachment of immovable property inI.T.C.P. No.16 dated 17.06.2003 passed by the 3rd respondent hereini.e. The Recovery Officer, Central, Madurai in respect of land andhouse property Resurvey No.11/7, bearing Plot No.36-37, ShanmugaNagar, Thirumangalam, Madurai District, quash the same so far as thepetitioner is concerned and consequently direct the 3rd respondent toforbear from issuing notices to the tenants or collecting rents inthe above mentioned property or harass the petitioner herein.
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 19.08.2015, there wasno representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Court adjournedthe matter to 26.08.2015 to post under the heading "for dismissal".Again when the matter was taken up hearing on 26.08.2015 also, there
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter wasdirected to be listed under the caption "for dismissal" on09.09.2015, in order to give one more opportunity to the petitioner.Even to day, though the matter is listed under the caption "fordismissal", there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence,the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrarrg To1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-I MADURAI2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) CENTRAL II NUNGAMBAKKAM CHENNAI - 343. THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER CENTRAL MADURAI +1cc to Mr.T.Pramod Kumar Chopda, Advocate, S.R.No.50631W.P.No.35027 of 2003VD(CO)CA(01/10/2015)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.