Mrs.savitri Ram Karnani v. Income-Tax Officer, Ward 21(2)(4), Mumbai
High Court
18 Apr 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mrs.savitri Ram Karnani v. Income-Tax Officer, Ward 21(2)(4), Mumbai
Date of order
18 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mrs.savitri Ram Karnani v. Income-Tax Officer, Ward 21(2)(4), Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5031 OF 2010
Mrs.Savitri Ram Karnani..Appellant.
Versus
Income-tax Officer, Ward 21(2)(4), Mumbai..Respondent.
Mr.Mandar Vaidya for the appellant.Ms.Padma Divakar for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 18[th] April, 2011.
1.Learned counsel for the parties state that the questions of law raised in this appeal are answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee by the decision of this Court in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – IV, Mumbai V/s. Shri Bharat R. Ruia (HUF), being Income Tax Appeal No.1539 of 2010 decided on 18-04-2011.
3.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed. No costs.
(Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue